Donald Trump has asked the US Supreme Court to step in and protect his tariff measures. He seeks to overturn a ruling that declared his wide-ranging trade duties illegal.
Executive power under scrutiny
The administration filed its petition on Wednesday night. It urges the court to quickly decide whether a president can impose tariffs without congressional approval. Last week, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 7-4 against Trump. Judges stated that only Congress holds the authority to set import duties.
Billions at stake
The case could disrupt Trump’s trade and foreign policy plans. It may also force the US to refund billions collected through tariffs. Trump defended his actions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The law permits presidential steps against “unusual and extraordinary” threats. In April, he declared an economic emergency, saying trade imbalances harmed US manufacturing and threatened national security.
Enforcement delayed for appeal
Although the appeals court ruled against Trump, it postponed enforcement to allow an appeal. “The stakes in this case could not be higher,” Solicitor General John Sauer wrote in Wednesday’s filing. He argued the decision disrupted critical trade negotiations and created legal uncertainty. He warned it weakened the president’s ability to prevent an economic and foreign policy crisis.
Small businesses challenge tariffs
The lawsuits were filed by small companies that say the tariffs threaten their survival. Their lawyers remain confident. “These unlawful duties are harming small businesses,” said Jeffrey Schwab of the Liberty Justice Center. “We hope for a swift resolution for our clients.” If the Supreme Court refuses review, the ruling takes effect on October 14.
Previous legal defeats
In May, the Court of International Trade in New York also ruled the tariffs unlawful. That judgment was paused during appeals. The lawsuits were brought by small firms and a coalition of states. In April, Trump signed executive orders creating a 10 percent baseline tariff and “reciprocal” tariffs on more than 90 countries.
International consequences
The appeals court also struck down tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China. Trump argued they were necessary to curb drug imports. Other duties, including those on steel and aluminum, remain in effect. They rely on a separate presidential authority.
